Now, Citrus Paradisi has a rating of 1-3 depending on the use.Īs far as I know, the scientific data on the toxicity of these ingredients have not changed. Now, however, Methylchloroisothiazolinone has a rating of 2-5 and Benzisothiazolinone has a rating of 3-6.Īnother example is Citrus Paradisi (Grapefruit) Seed Extract that the EWG used to rate 6. To demonstrate, such preservatives as Methylchloroisothiazolinone and Benzisothiazolinone used to have ratings of 6 and 6-7 respectively (with 10 as most toxic).
#SKIN DEEP COSMETIC DATA BASE SKIN#
The Skin Deep database changes its ratingsĪnother point I consider worth mentioning is the fact that the EWG cosmetics database has been changing its ratings lately.
So, I have searched the Environment Canada Domestic Substance List, but found no evidence of that.
For example, the EWG states that the Environment Canada Domestic Substance List has classified rose hip oil as expected to be toxic and harmful. In my experience, there have been instances when I did not see sufficient reasoning of the EWG rating in the referenced sources. This is what I do before making my final judgement about an ingredient. Therefore, a product rating should first and foremost make you ask the question, “What is the basis for this rating?” Instead of just looking at the given rating as the ultimate truth, choose to check the literature upon which the EWG database forms its opinions and make your own opinion. Oftentimes, my opinion about an ingredient or product is different, and I believe it is ok, especially when you can back it up. They include, but are not limited to, the Cosmetic Ingredient Review Panel reports, medical studies in the National Library of Medicine, European Union Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety reports, and reporting from European Chemicals Agency. In other words, they are a result of interpretation of the various scientific sources that I use, too. The first point I would like to emphasize is that the EWG database ratings are a reflection of an opinion, not the indisputable truth. The EWG cosmetics database expresses an opinion Nevertheless, it has its limitations, and I believe that knowing them can help you understand how products and ingredients get their ratings. It is dedicated to protecting human health and the environment and is a good way to estimate the safety of products you consider buying. To begin with, the Skin Deep database powered by the Environmental Working Group (EWG) is a US non-profit organization. Why my product ratings differ from those of the Skin Deep database
#SKIN DEEP COSMETIC DATA BASE HOW TO#
Also, you will learn how to use this cosmetics database without getting potentially misleading information. Therefore, in this post, we will discuss the reasons behind my rating choices. So, I understand the confusion the difference in our ratings may cause. No doubt, the EWG cosmetics database is a great resource that has rated over 73,000 products. If you have been following me for some time, you might have noticed that some of my product and ingredient ratings differ from those of the Skin Deep database powered by the Environmental Working Group.
0 kommentar(er)
